For Christmas I got an interesting gift from a good friend - my really own "best-selling" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (terrific title) bears my name and my image on its cover, and it has radiant evaluations.

Yet it was entirely composed by AI, with a few easy prompts about me provided by my good friend Janet.

It's a fascinating read, and really amusing in parts. But it likewise meanders rather a lot, and is somewhere in between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It mimics my chatty style of writing, but it's also a bit repetitive, and extremely verbose. It might have exceeded Janet's triggers in looking at information about me.

Several sentences start "as a leading innovation journalist ..." - cringe - which might have been scraped from an online bio.

There's likewise a mysterious, repetitive hallucination in the form of my cat (I have no animals). And there's a metaphor on almost every page - some more random than others.

There are dozens of business online offering AI-book composing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I contacted the primary executive Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he informed me he had sold around 150,000 personalised books, mainly in the US, since pivoting from assembling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller expenses ₤ 26. The firm uses its own AI tools to generate them, based on an open source big language design.

I'm not asking you to purchase my book. Actually you can't - just Janet, who produced it, can order any further copies.

There is presently no barrier to anyone producing one in anybody's name, including celebrities - although Mr Mashiach states there are guardrails around abusive material. Each book contains a printed disclaimer mentioning that it is fictional, created by AI, and designed "exclusively to bring humour and pleasure".

Legally, the copyright comes from the firm, but Mr Mashiach worries that the item is planned as a "personalised gag present", and the books do not get offered further.

He wants to expand his variety, generating different categories such as sci-fi, and perhaps offering an autobiography service. It's developed to be a light-hearted kind of consumer AI - selling AI-generated items to human clients.

It's likewise a bit terrifying if, like me, you write for a living. Not least because it probably took less than a minute to generate, and it does, certainly in some parts, sound just like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and actors worldwide have actually revealed alarm about their work being utilized to train generative AI tools that then churn out comparable material based upon it.

"We must be clear, when we are discussing information here, we in fact imply human creators' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, founder of Fairly Trained, which projects for AI companies to regard creators' rights.

"This is books, this is articles, this is pictures. It's works of art. It's records ... The whole point of AI training is to discover how to do something and after that do more like that."

In 2023 a song including AI-generated voices of Canadian singers Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social media before being pulled from streaming platforms because it was not their work and they had actually not granted it. It didn't stop the track's creator trying to choose it for a Grammy award. And even though the artists were phony, it was still hugely popular.

"I do not believe using generative AI for innovative functions ought to be prohibited, however I do think that generative AI for these purposes that is trained on people's work without consent should be banned," Mr Newton Rex adds. "AI can be extremely effective however let's construct it morally and relatively."

OpenAI states Chinese competitors utilizing its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes industry and dents America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - consisting of the BBC - have actually picked to obstruct AI designers from trawling their online content for training purposes. Others have decided to team up - the Financial Times has partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for instance.

The UK government is thinking about an overhaul of the law that would permit AI designers to use creators' content on the web to assist develop their models, unless the rights holders decide out.

Ed Newton Rex explains this as "madness".

He mentions that AI can make advances in areas like defence, health care and logistics without trawling the work of authors, journalists and artists.

"All of these things work without going and altering copyright law and messing up the livelihoods of the nation's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in the House of Lords, is also strongly against eliminating copyright law for AI.

"Creative markets are wealth creators, 2.4 million jobs and a lot of pleasure," states the Baroness, vmeste-so-vsemi.ru who is likewise an advisor to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The federal government is undermining one of its finest carrying out markets on the unclear promise of development."

A federal government representative said: "No relocation will be made till we are definitely positive we have a practical strategy that provides each of our goals: increased control for right holders to assist them certify their content, access to premium product to train leading AI models in the UK, and more openness for ideal holders from AI developers."

Under the UK federal government's new AI strategy, a nationwide information library including public data from a wide variety of sources will likewise be made readily available to AI scientists.

In the US the future of federal guidelines to manage AI is now up in the air following President Trump's return to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that to boost the safety of AI with, to name a few things, companies in the sector needed to share information of the operations of their systems with the US government before they are released.

But this has actually now been repealed by Trump. It remains to be seen what Trump will do instead, however he is said to want the AI sector to face less policy.

This comes as a number of suits against AI companies, and especially against OpenAI, continue in the US. They have been gotten by everyone from the New York Times to authors, music labels, and even a comic.

They claim that the AI firms broke the law when they took their material from the internet without their authorization, and utilized it to train their systems.

The AI companies argue that their actions fall under "reasonable use" and are therefore exempt. There are a number of aspects which can constitute reasonable usage - it's not a straight-forward meaning. But the AI sector is under increasing examination over how it collects training data and whether it need to be spending for it.

If this wasn't all sufficient to ponder, Chinese AI company DeepSeek has shaken the sector over the previous week. It became one of the most downloaded complimentary app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek claims that it developed its innovation for a fraction of the price of the similarity OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security concerns in the US, and threatens American's current dominance of the sector.

When it comes to me and a career as an author, I think that at the minute, if I actually desire a "bestseller" I'll still need to write it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the current weakness in generative AI tools for larger tasks. It is full of mistakes and hallucinations, and it can be rather tough to read in parts due to the fact that it's so long-winded.

But given how quickly the tech is evolving, I'm not exactly sure the length of time I can remain confident that my considerably slower human writing and modifying abilities, garagesale.es are much better.

Register for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the biggest advancements in global innovation, with analysis from BBC correspondents worldwide.

Outside the UK? Sign up here.